![]() ![]() Such Symbols Are Not Found In The Normal Keyboard, But Such Symbols Are Used In Day To Day Use. Special Characters As The Name Suggests, Are The Letters Which Are Neither Numeric Nor Alphabetical. I'm not trying to be a pain, I swear.Special Characters: HTML Symbols List (Copy & Paste) I read both of your suggestions, and like I said, maybe I'm not understanding, but I don't think either of your suggestions apply to what I'm looking for. It seems like you would almost have to tag the files like you do with an mp3 through MP3gain. Is there a way to tell RG that when "In Rainbows" plays, to automatically lower the volume by 12dB instead of 10dB? The same goes for another album I have - RG lowers the volume 5dB, but I think that's too quiet, so I want to only lower it 3dB. For example - Radiohead's "In Rainbows" still seems louder to me when adjusted through RG, so instead of lowering the volume 10dB, maybe I want to lower the whole album 12dB. What I'm saying is that if I have an album that has an album gain of -10dB according to RG, sometimes I am happy with RG's adjustment other times I am not. I don't want to adjust every single FLAC I have by hand. Thanks to 2Bdecided and JAZ.but maybe I am not fully understanding what you are saying, or I am not explaining myself correctly. ![]() I'm just looking to see if RG will let me adjust the volume after it calculates a RG value. Again, to my ears, that's the most pleasing way for me to enjoy music at the same volume. I usually adjust it for all songs to be at 4.5 (but, based on the reason for this thread, sometimes I make it 3.0, or 6.0). When I adjust my mp3s in MP3gain, I don't look at the volume, I look at the max no-clip gain. There's more dynamic range in the first song, and to my ears, that makes the song louder. Excuse me while I talk in mp3gain terms here, but.for example.a song with a "volume" of 91.0dB with max no-clip gain of 0.0 is louder to my ears than a song with a "volume" of 91.0 dB with max no-clip gain of 4.5 or 6.0. I knew someone was going to say this immediately. Weird, because they use the exact same algorithm, as documented on HA's hosted site: here. ![]() Quote from: mattdm11 on 01:38:40 To these ears, RG doesn't do a good of a job as I can do with MP3gain. It happens though that modification of the computed RG value is a must do.ĮDITED: Very personal experience removed which may have been mistaken as a general advice. If not the result is usable though not optimal most of the time. Important: when lowering volume (which is usually done when applying RG) mp3gain's modification of the audio content is a lossless process.Īs for manual RG value modification: according to my experience automatic RG computation usually gives the right answer. Moreover with a RG featured player RG value is taken care of exactly. Only disdavantage is mp3gain's accuracy of +/-0.75 db which however is sufficient in practice. This is an important feature for the majority of mobile DAPs. While replay gain value can be computed and stored in the music file with many tools (for instance with foobar), and the RG value can be modified manually if wanted so, mp3gain (and its variant aacgain) has the AFAIK unique feature that the audio content of a music file is modified in such a way that RG's loudness modification works with any player. Maybe the misunderstanding comes from this:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |